Elections

2026 Maryland Candidate Survey: Districts 41-47

MD CAPE does not endorse nor oppose any candidate, under any circumstance and no inference of endorsement or opposition should be concluded as a result of the information provided here.

Survey Questions

Candidate were asked five questions. They could respond with “agree” or “disagree” and/or provide comments for each.

1. Aid to nonpublic schools

Do you agree or disagree that the state legislature should support and enable a diversity of educational options for students in Maryland beyond the traditional public school setting that is based on zip code?

2. Public dollars

At times, opponents to nonpublic school funding say “public dollars are only for public schools.” Do you agree or disagree?

3. Federal education tax credit

Do you agree that Maryland’s governor should opt Maryland into the new federal education tax credit program? This would raise hundreds of millions of dollars for Maryland public and nonpublic students and it costs the state nothing to opt in.

4. Maryland BOOST Scholarship Program

Do you agree or disagree with continuing current funding levels for new students to participate in Maryland’s BOOST Scholarship Program? BOOST provides scholarships to low-income students to be used to attend nonpublic schools.

5. State funding for nonpublic schools

Do you agree or disagree with the state’s current practice of including funding in the state budget for infrastructure and maintenance for aging buildings and security upgrades for nonpublic schools?

General Assembly Districts 41 to 47

Dist. 41 Delegate
Dist. 41 Delegate
Dist. 41 Delegate
Dist. 42 Senator
Dist. 42 Senator
Dist. 42B Delegate
Dist. 42C Delegate
Dist. 43A Delegate
Dist. 47A Delegate
Shannice Anderson (D)
Adrian Muldrow (D)
Sandy Rosenberg (D)
Paul Henderson (D)
Adam Wood (R)
Larry A. Novak (R)
Steve Patten (R)
Regina T. Boyce (D)
Rocio Treminio-Lopez (D)
1. Nonpublic school aid
2. Public dollars only for public school
3. Federal tax credit
4. BOOST
5. State funding nonpublic schools

(D) = Democrat; (R) = Republican. Check mark = Agree; X = Disagree.

Candidate Comments

Candidates could provide comments for any or all questions.

Dist. 41 Delegate • Candidate Shannice Anderson (D)

1. Nonpublic school aid

Children should have access to a variety of educational pathways. Basing education on zipcode limits that access and opportunity.

2. Public dollars only for public school

Public dollars should be allocated to all schools that serve the public.

3. Federal tax credit

That means Maryland can expand opportunity without pulling from the state budget—a key point given concerns about fiscal discipline.

4. BOOST scholarships

I actually believe that funding for the BOOST program should increase so that more children have access to scholarships

5. State funding for nonpublic schools

The state should support the viability of nonpublic schools. Children should have the option as each child is unique

Dist. 41 Delegate • Candidate Adrian Muldrow (D)

1. Nonpublic school aid

Yes, I support expanding educational options beyond zip-code-based schools. District 41 families deserve choices that fit students’ needs, including strong public schools, career training, charter and specialty programs, and safe alternatives. Accountability, equity, and student success must remain the priority.

2. Public dollars only for public school

Public dollars should support students and families, not only systems. Many taxpayers in District 41 and across Maryland choose private or nonpublic schools while still paying taxes. Their voices count too. Any funding model should ensure fairness, accountability, and that every child has access to quality education.

3. Federal tax credit

As a Delegate, I will review any federal program that can offer significant educational opportunities to students at no cost to the state. If accountability and fairness are ensured, we cannot leave Maryland families behind, especially if it aligns with our spending model.

4. BOOST scholarships

I’m open to continuing current funding levels for new students in the BOOST Scholarship Program, while carefully reviewing costs, outcomes, and accountability. We should fund what works, expand access for low-income families, and ensure every student has the opportunity to attend a school that best supports their success.

5. State funding for nonpublic schools

My position is that funding should prioritize safe, functional buildings and effective curriculum outcomes, with strong accountability and transparency. We must support students wherever they learn while ensuring public schools remain fully funded and every tax dollar delivers results.

Dist. 41 Delegate • Candidate Sandy Rosenberg (D)

1. Nonpublic school aid

I have consistently supported an increase in state aid to nonpublic schools. It is a sound investment in our children’s future.

2. Public dollars only for public school

We can and should fund the Blueprint for public schools and nonpublic schools.

3. Federal tax credit

This tax credit would be a worthy investment in k-12 education.

4. BOOST scholarships

I would support an increase in the BOOST program, provided the Blueprint is fully funded.

5. State funding for nonpublic schools

No child should attend school in an unsafe environment.

Dist. 42 Senator • Candidate Paul Henderson (D)

2. Public dollars only for public school

Public dollars follow public school students to their schools of choice. It is important that those public dollars are paying for an approved curriculum, certified teachers and following the state testing requirements.

4. BOOST scholarships

In this time of budgetary constraints and structural budget deficits savings must be found everywhere in the state budget.

Dist. 42 Senator • Candidate Adam Wood (R)

4. BOOST scholarships

If I remember right, Wes Moore cut funds to this program. I would support restoring or increasing funding.

Dist. 42B Delegate • Candidate Larry A. Novak (R)

1. Nonpublic school aid

The EANS program, which is generally based on low-income student enrollment, is a program I would support for schools that qualify.

2. Public dollars only for public school

The reason I agree is non-public schools often do not have the same financial oversight or accountability as public schools. Also the funds could at times drain public resources, resulting in reduced funding for a majority of students.

3. Federal tax credit

With the current state of education in Maryland, i would support a program that would improve the education system. The graduation rate in some areas of the state is declining. If the state opts into the tax credit program, there has to be total transparency as to where the funds are being allocated.

4. BOOST scholarships

I agree with the BOOST program as long as the schools have a current Certificate of Approval from the MSBE. Also they must participate in non public programs in order to receive certain funding.

5. State funding for nonpublic schools

I agree with the current practice. I believe all students should have a safe, welcoming environment in which to grow and learn. The last thing a student should have to worry about is their own personal safety. It detracts from the education process.

Dist. 42C Delegate • Candidate Steve Patten (R)

1. Nonpublic school aid

Every child deserves access to an education that meets their needs. Expanding options beyond zip code-based assignments gives families, especially those of limited means, the ability to choose the right environment for their child.

2. Public dollars only for public school

Public dollars are meant to support students, not systems. When funding follows the student, families have greater flexibility to choose the best educational setting, including public, private, or faith-based options.

3. Federal tax credit

If Maryland can access additional resources to expand educational opportunities for students at no cost to the state, we should take advantage of it. Supporting students across all educational settings strengthens outcomes and benefits families.

4. BOOST scholarships

The BOOST program provides critical opportunities for low-income families to access schools that best meet their children’s needs. Continuing funding helps ensure more students have access to a quality education regardless of income.

5. State funding for nonpublic schools

Nonpublic schools serve Maryland families and contribute to our broader education system. Families support education through their taxes regardless of where their children attend school. Supporting infrastructure and security helps ensure safe learning environments for all students.

Dist. 43A Delegate • Candidate Regina T. Boyce (D)

1. Nonpublic school aid

I am not clear of what exactly is being asked. A place like Baltimore City, for instance, has school choice so a student would be able to access a school of their choice outside of their zip code.

2. Public dollars only for public school

Private school’s charge a price for children to attend. The state constitution, (Article VIII, § 1), mandates that the General Assembly establish a “thorough and efficient” system of free public schools.

3. Federal tax credit

I would only support such a tax credit for students that need to be in nonpublic schools, funded by the state, for disabilities.

5. State funding for nonpublic schools

I just passed a bill that would allow nonpublic schools, those that receive public dollars, access to school construction dollars through a competitive process. I both agree and disagree.

Dist. 47A Delegate • Candidate Rocio Treminio-Lopez (D)

1. Nonpublic school aid

As a Mayor and mother of four children, I have had the opportunity to have them attend both public and private schools. I believe families deserve access to quality education beyond the zip code. I support diverse options, including nonpublic schools. Access to a diverse education system opens opportunities for all.

2. Public dollars only for public school

Public education is essential, and I will always support strong public schools. At the same time, I support targeted programs that help families access educational setting that best meet their child’s need with accountability and transparency.

3. Federal tax credit

I support bringing additional federal resources to Maryland that expand opportunity for students. These funds should benefit both public and nonpublic school communities, with clear accountability to ensure equitable access.

4. BOOST scholarships

The BOOST program helps low-income families access educational options that meet their children’s needs. I support continuing this program while ensuring strong public school funding and accountability so every student has the opportunity to succeed.

5. State funding for nonpublic schools

I support targeted state investments for safety and infrastructure in nonpublic schools. Every student deserves a safe learning environment, and these improvements benefit entire communities while we continue prioritizing strong funding for public schools.

Additional candidates (did not respond):

Senate: District 41 – Dalya Attar (D), 41 – Malcolm P. Ruff (D), 42 – Kevin Ford (R), 42 – Matt Fox (R), 42 – Paul V. Konka (D), 42 – Stephanie Popescu (D), 43 – Mary Washington (D), 44 – Charles E. Sydnor (D), 45 – Cory V. McCray (D), 46 – Emmanuel Digman (R), 46 – Bill Ferguson (D), 46 – Bobby LaPin (D), 47 – Malcolm Augustine (D)

House: District 41 – Reuven Amos (D), 41 – Chezia Cager (D), 41 – Matt Menter (D), 41 – Sean A. Stinnett (D), 41 – Ryan Turner (D), 42A – Alexander Harlan (R), 42A – Dan Katz (R), 42A – Jyoti Mohan (D), 42A – Charles Edward Murphy (R), 42B – Michele Guyton (D), 42B – Jeffry K. McDonald (R), 42C – Corynne Courpas (D), 43A – Elizabeth Embry (D), 43B – Cathi Forbes (D), 44A – Eric Ebersole (D), 44A – Chuck Linton (R), 44B – Bishop Barry Chapman (D), 44B – Domonic Martin (R), 44B – Aletheia McCaskill (D), 44B – Sheila Ruth (D), 44B – Sherry Scipio (D), 45 – Jackie Addison (D), 45 – Chanel A. Branch (D), 45 – George Johnson (D), 45 – Stephanie Smith (D), 45 – Robert Stokes (D), 45 – Caylin Young (D), 46 – Jeremy L. Amason (R), 46 – Luke Clippinger (D), 46 – Mark Edelson (D), 46 – Robbyn Lewis (D), 47A – Diana M. Fennell (D), 47A – Robert Julian Ivey (D), 47A – Fred M. Price (R), 47B – Deni Taveras (D)